swan_tower: (Default)
[personal profile] swan_tower
If you've read the entirety (yes, I mean the entirety) of Dorothy Dunnett's Lymond Chronicles, then this post is for you.

I have a project in mind for this summer, or however long it actually takes me: I would like to re-read the Lymond Chronicles.

But, you say, doesn't that usually sink you into a slough of despond where you think your own writing sucks? And don't you have a novel to write this summer?

Yes, generally, and yes, I do. But while Dunnett may make me feel bad about my writing, I don't think she actually makes my writing bad (except, y'know, by comparison), so as long as I sit my ass down in the chair anyway, I should be okay. And -- more to the point -- that's kind of why I'm doing this. You see, I don't just intend to re-read them. I intend to do a close re-reading of a craft-focused sort, looking for the kinds of things I've talked to some of you about, like how she manipulates point of view, or describes certain things but not others, or makes that one duel the awesomest duel ever seen on the page. (In other words, I'm trying to get over my inferiority complex by anatomizing it.) And I'll answer a whole lot of niggling questions I need to re-read for, like which characters call him by his given name and when they start (or stop) doing so, how old he is when certain events happen, and just when we start seeing signs of [spoiler] or first get told [spoiler] but don't realize what it means.

I could do this without other people, but it wouldn't be half so fun. So the purpose of this post is to say, I will be blogging my progress through the books, bringing out interesting tidbits or answers to niggling questions, and inviting discussion in the comments. But this will involve spoilers like whoa, so I'll be doing so behind a specially-constructed filter. If you've read all the books, and are interested in joining the party, please comment here and I'll add you. If you have read some of the books, I'm sorry, but you really don't want to be a part of this yet; one of the things I intend to track as I read is the growth of a plot from book six that I know starts in book one, and I don't want to ruin that for you. But I'm more than happy to add people later, if they happen to finish the series and want to see what we've been up to.

Or, to put all this in other terms, I want to partially re-create the fun of the interactive "Let's watch [livejournal.com profile] khet_tcheba read the books for the first time" circus of myself and [livejournal.com profile] kurayami_hime, via Khet's locked posts on the subject. It will lack the tasty, tasty irony of seeing her make comments about ongoing plots when we, but not she, knew where they were going, but it should be fun regardless.


Edited to add: special brownie points for anybody who comes up with a good icon for me to use on such posts.

Date: 2007-05-16 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khet-tcheba.livejournal.com
I think it goes without saying that I want in on this.

I would dig up those nauseating 70's book cover scans again, but you said you wanted a good icon. Actually, one of the Queen's Play covers had a pretty nice, reasonably faithful rendition of Lymond. Failing that, every general icon subject I can think of is probably a spoiler on some level or another.

Date: 2007-05-16 06:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] swan-tower.livejournal.com
You and [livejournal.com profile] kurayami_hime got added when I created the filter, whether you wanted to be or not. <g>

As character portraits go, that doesn't suck -- though it is a touch odd to see Lymond in a ruff, however much one reminds oneself that it is period. (At least the series is Edwardian/Marian Tudor, so not the giant ridiculous ruffs of Elizabeth's court.) But it still isn't what he looks like in my head. Nothing is quite what he looks like in my head.

Beyond that . . . yeah, some spoiler-tastic icons could happen. But hey, if I'm only using them on the locked posts anyway, then the worst that could happen is that somebody looks through all my userpics and comes across it out of context.

Date: 2007-05-18 01:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khet-tcheba.livejournal.com
I think the ruff thing threw me for a loop briefly, as well. He doesn't strike me as being terribly fashion-minded - not out of lack of awareness (Sybilla would have taken care of that), but because such things might impede his movement and breathing. I don't recall if he ever expressed an opinion one way or the other on the subject (as we so seldom get into his head, and then only for very important events), but his casual disregard seems to indicate that he has better things to do than worry about what he's wearing. Unless it's a sword-belt.

What you really need, I realized at 4 AM, is a chess icon. It works on a number of levels, and isn't obviously a spoiler unless you know why it's a spoiler, in which case it's not spoiling anything at all.

Yes, thank you, subconscious brain, for deciding I needed to be awake for that.

Date: 2007-05-18 04:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] swan-tower.livejournal.com
Oooh -- you may have something, there.

Profile

swan_tower: (Default)
swan_tower

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45 678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 06:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios