This is what preparedness looks like.
Mar. 15th, 2011 11:38 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A really good post laying out the basics of Japan's response to the earthquake and tsunami.
The thing we need to bear in mind (other than the fact that Japan is a very long country, and most parts of it are hundreds of miles from the epicenter) is that there is no place in the world better-prepared for seismic trouble than Japan. Read through that post. Read about the checklists. Read about the architecture and the failsafes and the emergency warning systems. This is still a tragedy and a disaster, and no amount of human planning can completely mitigate that; ultimately, the planet is stronger than we are. But this would be a much larger tragedy and disaster if they hadn't been ready for it. (Even the situation at the Fukushima reactors isn't as bad as it could have been, though I can't confirm if the writer of that post is right about the scale of leakage there. I hope he is.)
Remember this, the next time some politician in your locality or nation proposes cutting funding for emergency preparedness, be it earthquake, tornado, hurricane, volcano, blizzard, or whatever. It's an easy cut to make in the short term, when you're trying to make a political point about "fiscal responsibility." But I put that inside sarcasm quotes because what you're really doing is gambling that nothing bad is really going to happen, and sooner or later, you lose that bet. Japan knows better than to gamble on that; they're home to some absurdly high percentage of the world's earthquakes. But other countries -- like the U.S. -- aren't so sensible, and places like New Orleans pay the bill.
I want to be more like Japan. I live in California, and I want to believe my state is equally ready for when the Hayward Fault blows. But I don't think we are.
The thing we need to bear in mind (other than the fact that Japan is a very long country, and most parts of it are hundreds of miles from the epicenter) is that there is no place in the world better-prepared for seismic trouble than Japan. Read through that post. Read about the checklists. Read about the architecture and the failsafes and the emergency warning systems. This is still a tragedy and a disaster, and no amount of human planning can completely mitigate that; ultimately, the planet is stronger than we are. But this would be a much larger tragedy and disaster if they hadn't been ready for it. (Even the situation at the Fukushima reactors isn't as bad as it could have been, though I can't confirm if the writer of that post is right about the scale of leakage there. I hope he is.)
Remember this, the next time some politician in your locality or nation proposes cutting funding for emergency preparedness, be it earthquake, tornado, hurricane, volcano, blizzard, or whatever. It's an easy cut to make in the short term, when you're trying to make a political point about "fiscal responsibility." But I put that inside sarcasm quotes because what you're really doing is gambling that nothing bad is really going to happen, and sooner or later, you lose that bet. Japan knows better than to gamble on that; they're home to some absurdly high percentage of the world's earthquakes. But other countries -- like the U.S. -- aren't so sensible, and places like New Orleans pay the bill.
I want to be more like Japan. I live in California, and I want to believe my state is equally ready for when the Hayward Fault blows. But I don't think we are.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 06:45 pm (UTC)It looks bad, it was bad, but it could have been a lot worse.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 06:55 pm (UTC)As of now the radiation levels at the plant have risen well beyond the levels the writer quotes, but the rate isn't constant and the levels have been decreasing between bursts of venting the reactors. Outside the immediate area of the plant levels are still far below the level of the exposure gained on an international flight (as of this second on NHK, they're quoting 23.72 microSieverts in Iwaki city in Fukushima; the flight from Tokyo to New York carries an exposure of 190 microSieverts).
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 07:01 pm (UTC)I have no doubt that the people at the Fukushima plant are taking a very bad hit, and like the emergency workers at Chernobyl, I'm awed to the point of tears by their courage. I hope it brings success, and they save the surrounding area from anything worse.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-16 02:35 am (UTC)The thing about using Chernobyl and Three Mile Island as your range is that there's a very wide range in there. I don't think it's possible for Fukushima to get as bad as Chernobyl, and the longer Tepco can keep it together, the less likely that becomes.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-16 04:01 am (UTC)I don't know if it can get as bad as Chernobyl -- it worries me that there are multiple reactors in trouble -- but I hope the various problems get under control soon.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 07:55 pm (UTC)Good link, though. Japanese corporations, from what I know of them, tend to be very, very good about that kind of communal response, and it's nice to hear that Cupertino is backing them up.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 07:21 pm (UTC)The Bush administration cut funding for the program on the day of the quake.
(That's on top of getting rid of the actual emergency management expert that Clinton had put in charge of FEMA and bringing in his oh-so-qualified campaign manager. When that guy quit, he recommended his old buddy Michael "I quit the horse association before they could fire me" Brown.)
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 07:40 pm (UTC)But yes - I hope our country recognizes the importance of preparation and I hope cuts aren't made to long-term technology developments that might maintain the integrity of our power grid and infrastructure in a disaster.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 08:10 pm (UTC)Yes! I totally agree. My husband and I are actually looking at taking our farm off the energy grid as far as possible. There are government grants available (or used to be, anyway - we'll see what the latest budget iterations look like) for households wanting to connect to private wind generators here (cute little windmills!) and I am hoping we'll be approved sometime in the not-too-distant future. The initial cost of installation is expensive, but I like the idea of providing as much of our own power as possible, and doing it without hurting the environment. We already have a geothermal heat pump which saves us hundreds of dollars in heating and cooling costs.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 09:32 pm (UTC)I may be misremembering, but iirc the last graphite reactors were taken off line, and then due to rising energy consumption and the increased costs of construction they were brought back into production.
I'll check to see if I'm mistaken.
Scary though.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 08:20 pm (UTC)It's been really interesting, through the tragedy, to see what a difference preparedness makes in a situation like this. I bet if it had happened in a 3rd world country, the number of casualties would be exponentially higher.
Times like this make me want to write a story about a natural disaster; only in a fantasy setting. It's not something that gets handled in genre fiction much. I'd just need a plot.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 08:51 pm (UTC)Preparedness is like any other kind of insurance. It costs money up front, and as a result, not everyone can afford it, even though that means they'll be paying an even larger bill further down the line. But if you can afford it, then it's flat-out stupid not to pay.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-16 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-16 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 08:59 pm (UTC)