swan_tower: (Maleficent)
I'm engaged in research mode right now for the second book of Isabella's memoirs. But this isn't the focused, targeted research of the Onyx Court series, where I know my time and place and am looking for details; I'm trying to decide what time(s) and place(s) I'm going to be drawing from to begin with. Since the general sphere of this second book is going to be "sub-Saharan Africa," that means doing a fair bit of 101-level familiarization, before I decide where to dig down further.

One of the books I just read had me rolling my eyes at certain obvious flaws, and I figured that when I write up my "books read" post in a few weeks, I'd dismiss it with a flippant sentence that would make [livejournal.com profile] teleidoplex and [livejournal.com profile] albionidaho laugh, and move on with my life. But then it occurred to me that the flaws I see as obvious actually may not be. I spent ten years in anthropology and related disciplines; I'm familiar with the ways in which anthropological writing can go wrong. Not everybody else is. And it might be useful for me to talk to more than just the anthropologists in my audience.

So here, with an illustrative example, is how to look critically at the genre. This isn't in-depth technical stuff, where you need to know the region or the theory to spot where it's going wrong; this is just critical thinking, of a mildly specialized sort. But the flaws are a type that can slip under the radar, if you're not accustomed to them.

Read more... )

Whew, that was long. Feel free to chip in with similar points or examples in the comments, and I'll answer any questions I can. I really have a hard time telling how much of this is obvious and self-explanatory, how much is obvious once you know to think about it, and how much is still half-buried in arcane anthropological jargon.

Also, if you know of any better books on daily life in the kingdom of Benin, please do let me know. :-)
swan_tower: (academia)
Apparently I'm developing this thing for arguing with mind-melds.

In this instance, SF Signal is taking on gender imbalance in spec fic publishing. Lots of food for thought in there, but I'm at the point where my single overwhelming thought is this:

Is there, anywhere out there, a sociologist with both the necessary interest in genre fiction and the necessary methodological rigor to get us some actual data?

Because until somebody does that study, we're arguing from evidence that is 98% anecdotes and gut feeling. Some magazines (Strange Horizons, Fantasy) openly discuss the gender breakdown of their submissions and publications; Broad Universe has scraped data from issue runs of some more. But where's the data for novels? First novels, bestseller novels, big contracts, broken down by (admittedly fuzzy) categories of sub-genre, maybe even weighted for type of narrative if our hypothetical sociologist is good enough. Reviews, awards, hardcover versus trade paper versus mmpb publication. In a dream world we'd know the submission stats, too -- but good luck getting those. Even without them, it would be a start.

It makes me regret my exit from academia, but truth is, I could never do this study. You really need a sociologist, not an anthropologist; this is not participant-observation work.

Some things we do know: that the people who say "I just buy/read good work, regardless of who wrote it" are naive. It's well-established, in fields ranging from biology to symphony orchestras, that the perceived gender of individuals affects their reception: the percentage of women in orchestras went up after musicians began auditioning behind a curtain, with a carpet laid down so high-heeled shoes wouldn't click on the floor. Swap the names on journal articles, and readers will rate higher the one they think is written by a man. Very few editors or readers out there are actively hating on women writers; the real problem is the inactive prejudice.

But we need data before we can get to the deeper questions of "why," let alone "what do we do about it?" The relative absence of women in science fiction (as opposed to fantasy) no doubt arises from many factors, ranging from fewer women with the educational background to write hard SF, to less free time on their hands for the writing of it, to a reluctance to submit to markets they perceive as unfriendly to them, to editorial bias, to reader bias, and so around the merry-go-round. The relative presence of women in the current paranormal romance/urban fantasy borderland arises from a different set of factors. I don't think anecdotes and gut feeling are without their use, but we might get farther if we had actual concrete information.
swan_tower: (academia)
Those of you who read [livejournal.com profile] kniedzw's journal have already heard the news, but for the rest of you: my husband's employer filed for bankruptcy today, putting him out of a job.

This brings into the open something I've been considering for a good year, maybe more. Some of you have heard me talk about it, but I haven't said anything publicly because, well, public = real. (LJ = real, apparently.) But forming an agreement with my anthropology adviser constitutes pretty real, I'd say, so I might as well bite the bullet and type the words.

I'm leaving graduate school.

Yeah. Um. I have a whole lot to say on this topic, but to spare people's friends-lists, I'm putting it behind a cut.

A year's worth of thinking, maybe more. )

So this is the official decision: I'm going to jump through the necessary administrative hoops and do whatever thesis/project/whatever work they're willing to accept, and leave graduate school with a master's in anthropology and folklore.

What we don't have yet is a timetable. May 6th, I fly to London, and then Kyle and I go on the cruise and we don't get home until May 30th. July 10th, I have an appointment for lasik surgery here in town. October 1st, I have one of those research-intensive novels due. I have plans for a Midnight Never Come book launch at Pandemonium in Boston, and a con in Oklahoma at the end of July. Somewhere in there, I will finish my master's. In the meantime, there's the question of work for Kyle. I don't know what we'll be doing about that, and so I don't know when we'll be leaving.

But leaving will happen. It's the Great Bloomington Exodus: like a dandelion full of gamers, we're poofing out into the wild blue yonder, scattering our seeds across the U.S. For us, it seems it will be a little sooner than anticipated.

ICFA

Mar. 10th, 2008 07:55 pm
swan_tower: (swan)
(There are too many potential icons for this post, so you just get the swan.)

Attention anybody going to ICFA! I'll be there, of course -- proud attendee since 2003; I can advance both sides of my professional life by flying to Florida every spring, so what's not to like? -- and it turns out I'm going to be doing more than I thought.

At 10:30 a.m. on Thursday I'll be donning my academic hat (and my legal name) and participating in an interdisciplinary panel about fan studies -- a panel of the discussion type, not the "we all read our at best tangentially related papers" sort.

Also, at some point -- I don't know my time slot yet -- I'll be switching to writer-hat and writer-name, and reading in the creative track. I've been squeaked on to it due to other peoples' cancellations, so I suspect I won't be listed in the program, but they always post the errata next to the reg desk, so look for me there. (Yes, in my sixth year, the worst has finally happened: I'm on the program twice, under two different names.) I will, as you might expect, be reading from Midnight Never Come.

And lastly, I'll be bringing some small number of ARCs with me, to sell in the book room. My ego loves the mental image of a slugfest over the last copy between a rabid fan and a dusty old academic in the narrow, book-strewn aisles, but since the universe is unlikely to oblige me with such a scenario, you can probably guarantee your receipt of one simply by looking early in the con.

Hope to see some of you there!
swan_tower: (academia)
One of the difficulties of getting farther into your field of study is, you start to take certain ideas so much for granted that you don't remember anymore where you picked them up. And then you find yourself wanting to cite a source for one of those ideas, and you don't have the slightest clue who writes about such things.

Where by "you" I mean "me."

So, O my fellow anthropologists, please help me out: I need a good citation for two particular concepts in acculturation. One is that you learn by imitation, following the examples of the people around you. The other is that when you behave in a certain way, non-explicit social feedback tells you it is Good Behavior or Bad Behavior, and thus you are subtly encouraged toward the good behavior. (I'm pretty sure Judith Butler hits these ideas in the context of gender -- am I right? I still haven't gotten around to reading her -- but it would be good to cite someone who talks about it more broadly.)

Failing sources, I'd even appreciate being reminded of what formal terms there are for those two concepts. I know the ideas, but I'm failing to sound official about them.

huh.

Nov. 15th, 2007 02:31 am
swan_tower: (academia)
For the first time in my life, I find myself realizing that academic papers can have different voices, just like stories.

Maybe this was obvious to some of you. But while I knew I wrote papers differently for conferences (where I read out loud) than I do for classes or publication (where they'll be printed on a page), I tended to think of those as two faint variants on Academic Voice.

That stories have different voices has always been obvious to me. I can't tell you what "my" voice is, because "Calling into Silence" has a deliberately earthy, grounded tone to it, while "Nine Sketches, in Charcoal and Blood" is more high-flown Victorian and "The Snow-White Heart" is a pale lavender imitation of Lovecraft's purple prose. And I'd need an outside eye to tell me what, if anything, is "my" voice in all of that, the common thread in the prose that links them together.

But here I am, plugging away at an article for [livejournal.com profile] kleenestar, and the silly thing has found a voice. I wasn't making much progress on it yesterday or earlier today, but then tonight I hit upon the thought of structuring it loosely around the experience of "our hypothetical newcomer," a stranger to RPGs who is getting into one for the first time. From the moment I put that phrase down, something changed. This article is just the slightest bit tongue-in cheek. I'm addressing my subject soberly enough, but hardly a paragraph goes by without some little thing to liven it up: a faintly snarky comment about the "What is a role-playing game?" section in rulebooks, a passing jab at GURPs and its rules for digging holes. Yesterday and earlier today, this paper had no voice, and I was getting nowhere with it. Now I've found the voice, and I have over three thousand words down, from about 800 two hours ago. I keep telling myself I'm going to bed, and then coming back to put the next bit down.

It's just like a story. I can't really progress on it until I've found the plot/organization and the voice. Once I do? Zoom.

We'll see what [livejournal.com profile] kleenestar thinks of the result. If I have to, I can go back and make it more straight-laced. But right now, I'm going to run with what I have.
swan_tower: (Maleficent)
Here's the deal: course proposals to teach at Collins have to be turned in stupidly early. As in, by October 19th, I need a complete syllabus, including readings broken down by week, assignments, grading system, and everything else. And since I have a variety of other things between me an October 19th, I'm going to bootstrap myself through this process a bit by soliciting help; otherwise this hunt would take way too long.

I need suggestions for small (i.e. article- or chapter-sized), reasonably scholarly nonfiction readings on certain topics, as follows:


  • hard/soft primitivism
  • the place of women in republic-era Rome
  • western views of Far Eastern/Japanese history and culture
    (would Said's Orientalism work for that? I know he's more writing about the Middle East)
  • the American frontier, esp. the interaction of diversity there
  • current theories on how we perceive and use history
  • the performance of gender/sexuality in Elizabethan England
  • the intersection of religious, political, and secular life in the Renaissance
  • eighteenth-century piracy in the Caribbean
  • events leading up to the O.K. Corral gunfight (not the events of the day itself)


Bonus points if you can figure out what my course topic is, based on this eclectic set of needs. <g>
swan_tower: (academia)
I believe I loaned someone my photocopy of the "Fantasy as Mode, Genre, Formula" chapter of Brian Attebery's book at some point. [livejournal.com profile] prosewitch, was that you? Or someone else? I kind of need it back.

huhZAH!!!

May. 2nd, 2007 10:44 am
swan_tower: (Maleficent)
Ladies and gentlemen, I have a job for next spring!

I will be teaching "Writing Speculative Fiction" as a Collins course. And I'm giddy about the prospect.

A million thanks to everyone who contributed suggestions for the reading list a few months back. I'll post a finalized version of that list when I teach the course; between now and then it might get tweaked a bit.

And now, knowing that I have a year of employment secured, I can relax and start breathing again.
swan_tower: (academia)
It pleases me that I already have twenty-three comments on this weekend's rant, without me having had a chance to answer any of them yet. For those who have contributed to the discussion so far, I will respond, but probably not until tomorrow. For those who haven't read it: go see me compare SF elitists to nineteenth-century anthropologists. As I said to [livejournal.com profile] ninja_turbo, the post lacks swearing only if you think "warmed-over nineteenth century unilinear cultural evolutionary theory" isn't me swearing.

ICFA? ICFA was good. It's moving to Orlando next year, and from the sound of it that's going to be all-round a positive change, but I confess I will miss the familiarity of that hotel. (And I've only been going for five years; what of the people who have known it for twenty?) I would still love to see someone kidnap the Con Cat and bring him to Orlando, even if he does have fleas. Because I will miss having a kitty to pet.

My paper seems to have gone over well, despite being ten pounds of idea shoved in a five-pound sack. I will probably expand it a bitsy and then try to sell it to Strange Horizons, for those who wanted to read it. The expansion will be a Good Thing, though it will necessitate another round of prioritizing information, since I still won't be able to get remotely everything in there. (What, you mean trying to cover twenty-eight novels, three and a half editions of D&D, and thirty years of textual history in five thousand words isn't a manageable idea?)

Every paper and discussion I attended was good. This is unique in my conferencing experience so far. Either ICFA's getting better, or I had good karma this year.

I have a head full of thoughts, not all of them fully baked. Look out in the near future, though, for a manifesto on Anthropological Fantasy, coming to an LJ near you.

I have reached the point where I have a Manifesto.

This is an interesting place to be.
swan_tower: (academia)
Crap. I was doing so good -- but then patching a hole and putting on a conclusion spiked my wordcount to 4292, when 4100 is about the most I can fit in the time limit without talking too fast.

Well, that's what revision is for, and more ruthless reduction. Alas, Jarlaxle may end up on the cutting-room floor. (Along with other things, since I didn't spend two hundred words on him.)

But I think I may leave that for tomorrow. I'll have more perspective then, which is critically important when cutting stuff. And besides, I've worked hard the last two days; I want to read a book for a while before I go to sleep.
swan_tower: (academia)
Ruthless cutting of my paper this morning removed three hundred words or so, pulling me back from the rapidly-approaching wall that is the length limit for a conference. (I made it to 85% of the way done by bedtime; now I'm hovering just north of 75%.) Will this be enough space? Probably not. But at least I bought myself a tiny bit of breathing room.

I need to step back and let it compost a bit more, though, so I can figure out the most efficient way to organize this last section. It would be easy to bog down in detailed textual analysis, but I don't have that luxury. Broad patterns only, thank you, analysis-brain. We have approximately 4000 words to play with, and no more. And no, just speaking more quickly isn't an acceptable answer; we'll lose our audience and confuse everybody. We must be succinct. You do know what "succinct" means, right?

Don't answer that.
swan_tower: (academia)
I don't want to think about how many hours today I have spent wrestling with an unwieldy and oversized mass of information in order to produce the half of my ICFA paper I have so far. It's funny to think that I once contemplated finishing it in time for the February 1st grad student award deadline, given that I wrote the first sentence today. (I was going gangbusters on the reading back in January, but when I realized I just wouldn't have the time to write it, I stalled and got almost nothing done until today.)

So it goes.

The problem is, I really did bite off more than one ought to chew for a conference paper. In addition to about two dozen novels, I'm also looking at a good dozen or more gaming supplements from four different editions of D&D. Plus artwork, which I'm hardly mentioning at all. There are all kinds of nifty-keen subtleties that have happened along the way -- well, okay, most of them aren't actually nifty-keen, but some of them are -- but they just won't make it into the paper; I've got another six years of publishing history to get through before I start on the analytical part of the paper, and I'm already halfway to my page limit.

Certain sayings about ten pounds into five-pound containers come to mind.

But I'm brain-melty at this point, so I think it's time to take a break, and maybe chew on it a bit more before bed tonight. (It would be nice to finish the historical part of the paper, so I can do the analysis tomorrow and Tuesday.) And then, someday well after ICFA, I shall ponder whether I want to go back and expand the paper with some of the finer details for the purposes of submitting it to Strange Horizons.

You know, the original tongue-in-cheek title for this paper was "Drow: The Black Hole of Otherness." I think it is also "Drow: The Black Hole of My Sunday Before ICFA," given how much time it's eaten today.
swan_tower: (angry kitten)
I've always known that I don't like grading. But this is the first time I've been able to put it in such appalling terms:

I procrastinated from grading tonight by doing my federal and state taxes.

Doing my taxes was preferable to grading.

Ye gods.
swan_tower: (*writing)
First of all, Cat Rambo has done an interview with me over at Suite 101. She asks several nifty questions, both about my novels and my writing in general.

Also, Talebones #34 is available, containing "But Who Shall Lead the Dance? I haven't had a chance yet to read the rest of the issue, but Talebones is good folks.

Regarding my default icon: the people have spoken. A custom icon leads the pack, but the Summer Queen is in second place with as many votes as all the other options got together. I will look into possibilities for something custom, and keep the Summer Queen until I find something I like better.

Finally, do please contribute to my recent post looking for suggested readings. I wish I had the time to assemble the list on my own by reading all the YBFH and YBSF anthologies out there, or the entire ouevre of the Hugo Award, but alas, I don't. I need specific titles to choose from.
swan_tower: (*writing)
I could use some assistance from the internets in putting the finishing touches on a certain project. I'm planning to pitch a course proposal on writing speculative fiction (encompassing sf, fantasy, and supernatural horror), but I need readings! Most particularly I need suggestions of short fiction, but I'd also be interested in how-to texts that might be relevant to these topics.

UNIT ONE: INTRODUCTIONS
Week 1- Introduction to genre
Week 2- Language
Week 3- Outlining, critique, revision
[For these three weeks, I'd like one basic, accessible story from each of the genres I'm covering, just to get them warmed up.]

UNIT TWO: CRAFT
Week 4- Dialogue
Week 5- Point of view
Week 6- Description
Week 7- Exposition
Week 8- Style/Voice
Week 9- Character
Week 10- Setting
Week 11- Plot
[Here, of course, I want stories that particularly shine in the aspect du semaine.]

UNIT THREE: CONCEPTS
Week 12 - Gender
Week 13 - Race
Week 14- Morality
[I'm pretty sure Le Guin's "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas" will be the story for week 14, but the others are up in the air. The general idea of this unit is, hey, spec fic can play interesting games with these topics.]

UNIT FOUR: WHERE NOW?
Week 15- How to submit stories
[Might or might not have a reading for this week. It'll depend on whether I find a story I just really really love and want to end on.]

I would prefer short stories, though in a terrible pinch I might use a novel excerpt. Suggestions?
swan_tower: (Maleficent)
Oh, hell. It just occured to me that maybe this is what I should use as my icon for teaching my fairy-tale class next fall.

That doesn't bode so well for my students. <g>

Anyway, I mustered enough energy to do some updates on the Bryn Neuenschwander half of Swan Tower, which have been sorely overdue for a long time. There's nothing dramatic, but I finally got my C.V. posted in legible form and put a tiny bit more content into the areas about my research. The next big project for over there is a doozy: I want to gather up sources I've found useful on RPGs or fairy tales and make an online annotated bibliography. God only knows when that will happen, but I would like to do it someday. In the meantime, these minor updates will have to do.

And with that, I am done with my website for today.
swan_tower: (academia)

Just got official notice that my course proposal for Collins, the honors dorm here on campus, has been accepted. Next fall I'll be teaching "Fairy Tales in the Modern World," a class on contemporary retellings of folktales. It's mostly literature-based, but I'm slipping in what I can about movies, role-playing games, and the like.

I'm both very excited and a little nervous. I've got four years of teaching experience under my belt, but it's all as an assistant to a professor, so this will be my first time running my own course. The cool thing is, enrollment is limited to 20, so it will also be my first chance to really get to know my students personally, give detailed feedback on papers, etc, rather than plowing through sixty student assignments and teaching three sections. Since a lot of the students are going to be freshman and sophomores, this means I have a shot at actually influencing how they approach their college education. (Yeah, yeah, delusions of grandeur, I know. But I have hopes.)

updatery

Nov. 7th, 2006 04:00 pm
swan_tower: (Default)

World Fantasy was good. Got to see (read: stay with) Khet; got to socialize with many friends from previous cons and make some new ones. The con itself wasn't the best I've ever been to -- thin programming, too heavily focused on the topic du jour (the Robert E. Howard Centennial), and most of the panels I went to were okay at best -- but that's only one of the reasons I go, and not even the most important one, so I'm not upset.

Voted this afternoon. Most of my time was spent waiting for them to figure out what to do with the two women in front of me who had both moved and therefore needed to jump through administrative hoops. Link of interest: the Vote by Mail Project is pushing the model of voting Oregon uses, which appears to be vastly preferable on every front you can imagine. Worth taking a look at.

Also, started wading through my school e-mail that had built up over the weekend, and found I've made it through the first round of cuts for my Collins course proposal. Now I have a half-hour interview/presentation to go through, with some adjustments to be made to my syllabus. Not sure when I'll have the time to prep for that between now and Thursday, but I'd better find some, as it appears I stand an actual chance of getting this through.

swan_tower: (academia)

Ongoing endeavours with immediate deadlines on them:

  • AFS paper (status: 90% complete)
  • Collins course proposal (status: 80% complete)
  • C.V. revision (status: 95% complete)
  • midterm grading (status: 0% complete)
  • novel proposal (status: ??? complete)

For the first time in a while, my academic commitments are winning their ongoing war with my writing to eat my head. One week from today, when the first three items are done with and the fourth is (hopefully) mostly done, I'll be able to breathe and look at other things. In the meantime, I need to push them all toward completion. The status percentages looked a lot scarier at the beginning of this weekend, though; say what else you will about the last few days, but at least I managed to be productive with them.

Now I think I need some sleep.

Profile

swan_tower: (Default)
swan_tower

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45 678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 01:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios