(no subject)
Jul. 3rd, 2007 10:44 amTotally random gripe, but you know what? I'm not actually a fan of the way the web is getting more multimedia. (This gripe brought to you by the Onion, which has too much video and audio content these days for my taste. I miss when it was mostly text.)
Why does this irritate me? Because 95% of the time I'm at the computer, I'm listening to music. My own music. If a website loads up some song (MySpace, I'm looking at you) or I click on an innocuous-looking link and find a video starting to play, I have to go pause my music -- or, as I more often do, just back up to the previous page and go find something else that won't interrupt me. Also, I can read text at my own pace, whereas a video makes me go at its pace -- and when it's seven minutes long, I generally decide I don't care enough about whatever it is, and I go do something else.
Which is not to say I never want to watch videos. I just want to know that's what's coming. A lot of people these days put a (pdf) warning when a link leads to an Adobe file, since many of us dislike having Adobe launch out of nowhere, and don't always remember to check the url we're being pointed at before we click on it. I'd love to see a similar thing for videos, so I don't get ambushed by them. Then I can decide whether I want to go watch a video right now or not. Also? Don't just link saying "This is awesome" or some such. If you do that to a webpage, I can skim the content briefly and decide whether it's something that interests me. If I don't know what a video's about, I'm not going to sit around and wait to find out, then decide whether I, too, think it's awesome. (It usually isn't anyway.)
I also don't follow any video podcasting on blogs. I'd follow audio podcasting if I could be bothered to put it on my iPod (and video too, maybe, if I had an iPod that supported it), but not watching or listening on my computer. Again with the wanting to move at my own pace thing. And being able to skim over the stuff that doesn't interest me.
In the grand scheme of things, this is not an epic problem; I'm far more concerned with writing my novel and catching up on my e-mail and what our legislators will do about the White House thumbing its nose at them. But it's a minor irritant, and I thought y'all might like a post that isn't about MNC.
So warn folks when you're linking to a video, and give some sense of what the video is. Or Angry Kitten will come after you.
Why does this irritate me? Because 95% of the time I'm at the computer, I'm listening to music. My own music. If a website loads up some song (MySpace, I'm looking at you) or I click on an innocuous-looking link and find a video starting to play, I have to go pause my music -- or, as I more often do, just back up to the previous page and go find something else that won't interrupt me. Also, I can read text at my own pace, whereas a video makes me go at its pace -- and when it's seven minutes long, I generally decide I don't care enough about whatever it is, and I go do something else.
Which is not to say I never want to watch videos. I just want to know that's what's coming. A lot of people these days put a (pdf) warning when a link leads to an Adobe file, since many of us dislike having Adobe launch out of nowhere, and don't always remember to check the url we're being pointed at before we click on it. I'd love to see a similar thing for videos, so I don't get ambushed by them. Then I can decide whether I want to go watch a video right now or not. Also? Don't just link saying "This is awesome" or some such. If you do that to a webpage, I can skim the content briefly and decide whether it's something that interests me. If I don't know what a video's about, I'm not going to sit around and wait to find out, then decide whether I, too, think it's awesome. (It usually isn't anyway.)
I also don't follow any video podcasting on blogs. I'd follow audio podcasting if I could be bothered to put it on my iPod (and video too, maybe, if I had an iPod that supported it), but not watching or listening on my computer. Again with the wanting to move at my own pace thing. And being able to skim over the stuff that doesn't interest me.
In the grand scheme of things, this is not an epic problem; I'm far more concerned with writing my novel and catching up on my e-mail and what our legislators will do about the White House thumbing its nose at them. But it's a minor irritant, and I thought y'all might like a post that isn't about MNC.
So warn folks when you're linking to a video, and give some sense of what the video is. Or Angry Kitten will come after you.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 02:57 pm (UTC)Cheer!
The "here is a YouTube video with no context" thing drives me nuts. And no, "This is great!" does not count as context.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:00 pm (UTC)So give some sense of what the video is. Or else Jonie will come along with those angry kittens, and she WILL lick you. A lot.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 03:34 pm (UTC)It's actually one of the big reasons I really prefer LJ to myspace. Myspace seems a whole lot more like a popularity contest than friends who actually care about what's going on in each other's lives. Most of the bullitons are just stupid quiz-memes where they answer the same questions over and over again about themselves. I've never understood it.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 04:27 pm (UTC)My pet peeves are the obnoxious, tinny music-playing ads that jump you from an innocuous news report.
I was just reading an article about whether e-mail is going to become a relic of the pre-Web 2.0 internet (http://mikeg.typepad.com/perceptions/2007/06/im-at-the-burto.html). So, by falling behind on your e-mail you're actually getting ahead in the tech race.
The stuff going on in politics is dreadful. Is the system getting more corrupt or is the dirt just getting easier to find?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 05:34 pm (UTC)Just kidding!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-03 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-04 02:40 am (UTC)Oh...on CNN and Comedy Central (and a bazillion other sites) that try to force me to watch an ad before viewing a video link. The moment I see them loading, I mute the volume, scroll the video off until I can see only the timer and wait for the video to come on. I hate doing that too, but it's preferable to watching an ad.
Grrrrrr.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-04 03:58 am (UTC)Somehow, I think I am missing the point . . .
Date: 2007-07-04 03:42 pm (UTC)Ahem. Two minute flash video with music, death, and a kitty.
Even more awesome!
Erm, another flash video with music, star-crossed love, and a cat.