A Year in Pictures – Etched Window
Sep. 29th, 2014 08:00 am

This work by http://www.swantower.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
If I needed evidence that proper cameras still have the edge over cameraphones, this provides it. I tried to take a photo of this window (in the Okinawan Prefectural Budokan) with my phone, and it came out useless, with the etching totally washed out. When I came back the next day with my actual camera, though, I could control the settings enough that it came out beautifully.
Originally published at Swan Tower. You can comment here or there.
no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 03:50 pm (UTC)(I haven't bought a P&S digicam in a long time, and my 2-year-old phone camera is still better in several ways than the first two or three of them I ever bought....)
no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 06:03 pm (UTC)The thing that bugs me is, a phone is hard to hold steady. I feel like my phone pictures are much more liable to come out blurry because I have to hold the thing in my fingertips, rather than gripping it properly.
no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 06:23 pm (UTC)I tend to view phone photography as its own genre which should be judged according to its own merits and not as something intended to replace 'regular' photography. I have been shooting and editing with my phone daily for a few years now, and find it both interesting and a lot of fun, but as you mention, there certainly are situations where I can't do without a 'proper' camera (which tends to be film rather than digital these days, but that's a different story).
no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 06:27 pm (UTC)As for phone photography being its own thing, I guess it depends on what you consider "regular" photography to be. For a lot of the populace, it is a replacement for all the photography they would ever have done.
no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 06:52 pm (UTC)No argument that more people are taking photos, but I would say it's definitely a replacement, because they aren't also carrying around dedicated cameras. I'm looking at the mode of photography, not the images: they haven't stopped taking photos of X and replaced them with photos of Y, but the equipment has been swapped out rather than expanded.
no subject
Date: 2014-09-29 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-09-30 09:57 am (UTC)