Swan Tower facelift
Mar. 25th, 2007 09:53 pmAll right, folks. Courtesy of the inestimable
sapphohestia, Swan Tower is getting a facelift to its CSS. I would very much appreciate it if some of you could take a look at the pages she's mocked up with the new style, and let me know what you think. Is it readable? Does the page layout feel balanced? How does it work in other browsers, or with other sizes of screen? Etc. (Don't bother pointing out busted links; we've only got three pages set up. When the change happens for real, we'll just be pasting in the new CSS; all the links will work as they normally do.)
The three pages to look at are:
Introduction
Doppelganger
Midnight Never Come
There are two changes I still intend to make, though they haven't happened yet. One is that I'm trying to get a proper site logo designed, which would replace the current image in the upper left-hand corner. The other is that I intend to have a bit of padding around images (the example here is the Doppelganger cover image) so the text doesn't run right up against the border like it does now. But other than that, what changes, if any, would you folks suggest?
The three pages to look at are:
Introduction
Doppelganger
Midnight Never Come
There are two changes I still intend to make, though they haven't happened yet. One is that I'm trying to get a proper site logo designed, which would replace the current image in the upper left-hand corner. The other is that I intend to have a bit of padding around images (the example here is the Doppelganger cover image) so the text doesn't run right up against the border like it does now. But other than that, what changes, if any, would you folks suggest?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 03:53 am (UTC)Note: Doppelganger page: I think there's a misspelling; I think Jim Carry should be Jim Carey.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 03:57 am (UTC)looks good in Safari 2.0.4 (419.3).
-steve
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 04:36 am (UTC)2. Also good.
3. Eh. I've heard enough complaints about W3C validation that I'm not going to get my knickers in a twist over them complaining, unless it turns out to actually be a problem for people viewing the page. (Mostly it seems to be upset about my usage of 50% -- oh well -- and the link to IGMS, which I can't do anything about.)
Thanks for looking it over. Browser compatibility is hard for me to check.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 04:31 am (UTC)1) I widened it slightly so "Midnight Never Come" wouldn't wrap.
2) We moved it right so it wouldn't be hard up against the edge of the window.
3) We moved the content block further right so the fanlisting banner and the longer navbar lines wouldn't look cramped against the block.
The content block could maybe go five or ten pixels back to the left, though, which might help.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 10:40 am (UTC)Otherwise, I like the general "look" of the thing.
My 2 cents. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 04:13 pm (UTC)Also, on the border - I'm not sure whether it would help or hurt, but perhaps you could make a kind of double border by putting a very thin line of black between the gray and green. The green and black looks good, and the gray and black looks good; it's just the gray and green next to each other than looks off to me. Then again, tinkering with the shade of green might fix that, too.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 04:37 pm (UTC)I'm not bothered by the "military green."
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 06:15 pm (UTC)Another thing - which could just be me - is the picture size, the front cover of Doppelgänger is tiny and as such doesn't catch the eye at all (also not keen on the grey border - black might look sharper) I think it would look more enticing if the pici was about 40-50% bigger