True Blood: initial thoughts
Jul. 14th, 2010 01:56 pm(No, it isn't available streaming.
kniedzw moved it up in his DVD queue, which I'd been too lazy to do.)
I've only seen two episodes so far. But I wanted to post about my initial reaction, because it's so strong: I don't remember the last time I saw a show create character and setting so vividly, so fast.
I don't know what the deal is, either. Really good writing, acting, set dressing, etc? Do the writers try harder because the backwaters of Louisiana aren't as familiar to viewers as Midwestern suburbia or New York City? Maybe it's just that it isn't familiar, so even mediocre writing and acting and so on will strike me more vividly, because I haven't seen what they're presenting a hundred times before.
But that's really how it feels: like I'm seeing something new. These aren't the same characters I've seen in a dozen other shows. It remains to be seen what I think of them; maybe they'll annoy me or be badly written or develop in ways I think are ridiculous. Or maybe they'll turn out to be awesome. The setting, socially and physically, is very different; I don't know how accurate it is, but with more evidence I'll be better able to guess. The show talks more bluntly about race than I'm accustomed to; I'm interested to see what it uses that bluntness to say. All of those judgments are in my future: I can't make them based on only two episodes.
One judgment, though, I can make. From the first minutes of the first episode, True Blood had my attention. And that's more than a lot of shows can say.
I've only seen two episodes so far. But I wanted to post about my initial reaction, because it's so strong: I don't remember the last time I saw a show create character and setting so vividly, so fast.
I don't know what the deal is, either. Really good writing, acting, set dressing, etc? Do the writers try harder because the backwaters of Louisiana aren't as familiar to viewers as Midwestern suburbia or New York City? Maybe it's just that it isn't familiar, so even mediocre writing and acting and so on will strike me more vividly, because I haven't seen what they're presenting a hundred times before.
But that's really how it feels: like I'm seeing something new. These aren't the same characters I've seen in a dozen other shows. It remains to be seen what I think of them; maybe they'll annoy me or be badly written or develop in ways I think are ridiculous. Or maybe they'll turn out to be awesome. The setting, socially and physically, is very different; I don't know how accurate it is, but with more evidence I'll be better able to guess. The show talks more bluntly about race than I'm accustomed to; I'm interested to see what it uses that bluntness to say. All of those judgments are in my future: I can't make them based on only two episodes.
One judgment, though, I can make. From the first minutes of the first episode, True Blood had my attention. And that's more than a lot of shows can say.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 09:06 pm (UTC)I've not read the books, but in an interview with Charlene Harris, the author, she said she was intrigued by Anne Rice's placing of New Orleans, and wanted to offer a setting that not many had touched upon.
I won't spoil anything for you, but suffice to say, it's HBO, and there is sex. Quite a lot actually. Though the way they present it is quite often hilarious.
I'm very opinionated when it comes to vampires [they're my genre of choice], and the way TB presents them is wonderful. It's a bloody train wreck; and I can't stop watching it.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 10:26 pm (UTC)The Tudors did the same in the beginning. Though in historical context, that's what it was like, even if no one talked about it.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 09:20 pm (UTC)Sam Merlotte's trailer isn't a sign that he's trailer trash, and therefore unsophisticated and/or stupid; nor that he's a country boy, and therefore more likely to be able to adapt to reality than some city-slicker from Madison Avenue. It just is. It's part of the setting... which makes his comment "Most of my customers are stupid people" that much more telling.
The Stackhouse Residence (yes, it really does deserve capitalization... and I think I give little away by saying that it does so even more in the second season) is a weathered old house in the middle of a partially cleared area. No driveway. No separate box out front for delivery of the paper. Conversely, no pile of take-out menus taped to the refrigerator (which isn't exactly last year's model). But it just is.
The same goes for the individual characters. And the writing is such -- particularly in the middle four episodes of the first season -- that smartass viewers who think they know where things are going will get surprised, but not insulted, by what actually happens.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 10:05 pm (UTC)Now, I'm hesitant to accept that at face value, simply because I'm not in a position to evaluate the actual honesty of what it presents; this could all be very inaccurate. But it echoes just enough of the stereotypes I've seen to make me feel like I can see where the stereotypes come from, without repeating them in facile totality -- if that makes any sense. It's that balance that makes me feel, at least as a first impression, that it might be doing something right.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 10:42 pm (UTC)Mostly, I'm just relieved to see someone trying to more fairly portray the South on television, even if there are still plenty of missteps.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 10:40 pm (UTC)So, with that as my bona fide and caveat, let me say, no, really, that's how most people are in the backwoods small towns of La (and East Texas, for that matter.) Race really is that openly discussed; I found Tara to be completely believable and true to life. I've known quiet a few people who could have said exactly the things she's said in the show. People's reactions to her, to what she says and how she acts are also spot on. She may be skating close to the 'uppity black woman' stereotype, but, it's a stereotype because there really are people who act like that.
Small town life is a lot like what they depict, with everyone knowing everyone else, and yet there being a layer of secrets and secret lives. In some ways, everyone knows everything about everyone else; in other ways, each house holds secrets and mysteries...
I like the show because it doesn't take itself too seriously, it doesn't look down on small town life, it doesn't force the characters to be caricatures of the stereotypes... and it has vampires that don't sparkle, so it's just a win/win for me. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 11:22 pm (UTC)Good to hear an evaluation from somebody who grew up in that kind of environment. (I'm a Texas girl myself, but very much suburban Dallas, not the woodlands.)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-14 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 03:09 am (UTC)Also trying Fringe Season 1. It looked relevant to my interests. ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 05:42 am (UTC)Enjoy the rest,
-Shawn
no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 06:04 am (UTC)True Blood
Date: 2010-07-16 08:32 pm (UTC)Now we have gay sex in this season with werewolves involved. Oh, and the bodies they chose for the show. How can anyone be afraid of vampires? I used to be.
I just hope they stop when the well gets dry and don´t go and on for too long and lose their ways as often is the case with most shows.
Thank you!