more roundup
Jul. 24th, 2008 05:42 pmThese things have been piling up, so . . . .
I answer six questions for Jeff VanderMeer's Amazon blog. Some of them are standard. Some of them are very much not.
***
Doug Knipe, Sci-Fi Guy, liked the book.
So did Graeme Flory, though he felt a bit overwhelmed by the historical detail.
By contrast, Emily Huck didn't see much actual history in it, at least in the sense of specific events. (She will find this flaw remedied and then some in the next book, if she picks it up.)
Gayle Surrette of SFRevu forgot to take review notes while reading, which is encouraging.
Matt Staggs of Enter the Octopus thought the ending was a bit rushed, but liked it anyway.
Kathy, the Oklahoma Booklady, gave it 4.5 out of 5.
fhtagn read it side-by-side with The Queen's Bastard (which I blurbed) and liked it. Go Elizabethan fantasy!
And more good things from Aliette de Bodard, who's the first person I've seen peg it as a secret history. (Which is how I view it -- that and "historical urban fantasy" are my personal labels for it. Which answers a question in Graeme's review, I suppose.)
***
I've gotten way fewer e-mails about this book than I did after Doppelganger came out, but many more reviews, both professional and casual. Interesting.
I answer six questions for Jeff VanderMeer's Amazon blog. Some of them are standard. Some of them are very much not.
***
Doug Knipe, Sci-Fi Guy, liked the book.
So did Graeme Flory, though he felt a bit overwhelmed by the historical detail.
By contrast, Emily Huck didn't see much actual history in it, at least in the sense of specific events. (She will find this flaw remedied and then some in the next book, if she picks it up.)
Gayle Surrette of SFRevu forgot to take review notes while reading, which is encouraging.
Matt Staggs of Enter the Octopus thought the ending was a bit rushed, but liked it anyway.
Kathy, the Oklahoma Booklady, gave it 4.5 out of 5.
And more good things from Aliette de Bodard, who's the first person I've seen peg it as a secret history. (Which is how I view it -- that and "historical urban fantasy" are my personal labels for it. Which answers a question in Graeme's review, I suppose.)
***
I've gotten way fewer e-mails about this book than I did after Doppelganger came out, but many more reviews, both professional and casual. Interesting.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-30 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 03:05 am (UTC)In the middle of a very quiet PCU.
Thanks. *grin*
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 05:09 am (UTC)OH! There is something I can mention, I gave a copy to a friend for her birthday and that made her happy. She's been looking forward to reading it.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 08:41 am (UTC)The book sounds something amazing after I read your interview at the same blog. Good luck with future ideas.
PS: I once asked about a month ago about the possibility of a review copy. *looks down at his feet* Can I have one please? Even in e-format. Please. I want it more than chocolate.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 01:15 pm (UTC)Do me a favor? E-mail the pertinent information to me at the address listed on my site. I have poked my publisher on your behalf, and if I have your address, I may be able to get you something.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-27 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-29 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-30 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-30 07:58 pm (UTC)