book suggestion needed
Aug. 4th, 2007 10:13 pmI would like to open each of the five acts of Midnight Never Come with an epigraph.
(What, you thought I would actually be taking a really-and-truly break for any substantial length of time? Hah.)
I have sources picked out for four of the five, though in three of those cases there are several potential quotes I might use -- which means they haven't been firmly assigned to particular acts, except for the last one. In no particular order, therefore, they are: The Faerie Queene, The Book of the Courtier, The Prince, and Dr. Faustus.
I need one more.
So I'm opening the floor to suggestions. My requirements are as follows:
1) The book/poem/play/whatever must be contemporary to the period of the novel. That is, published no later than 1590. (The first three books of TFQ came out then, and since nobody seems to have conclusive proof as to the date of Faustus, I'm going with the argument that puts it some time 1588-1590.) If it's foreign, it needs to have been translated into English by 1590. If it's substantially older than that period, my ideal would be for it to have been popular in the Elizabethan era; Beowulf wouldn't cut it.
2) No Shakespeare. I haven't bothered looking up what, if anything, of his got written before 1590, but even if there is something, I'm making a point of not shoehorning him into this novel.
3) I'd like to avoid repeating any of the authors I already have. Ergo, no Discorsi, no other plays of Marlowe's, no Shepherdes Calendar or whatnot.
I know some of you are thorough-going Elizabethan geeks; any suggestions as to sources I could mine for that last epigraph?
(What, you thought I would actually be taking a really-and-truly break for any substantial length of time? Hah.)
I have sources picked out for four of the five, though in three of those cases there are several potential quotes I might use -- which means they haven't been firmly assigned to particular acts, except for the last one. In no particular order, therefore, they are: The Faerie Queene, The Book of the Courtier, The Prince, and Dr. Faustus.
I need one more.
So I'm opening the floor to suggestions. My requirements are as follows:
1) The book/poem/play/whatever must be contemporary to the period of the novel. That is, published no later than 1590. (The first three books of TFQ came out then, and since nobody seems to have conclusive proof as to the date of Faustus, I'm going with the argument that puts it some time 1588-1590.) If it's foreign, it needs to have been translated into English by 1590. If it's substantially older than that period, my ideal would be for it to have been popular in the Elizabethan era; Beowulf wouldn't cut it.
2) No Shakespeare. I haven't bothered looking up what, if anything, of his got written before 1590, but even if there is something, I'm making a point of not shoehorning him into this novel.
3) I'd like to avoid repeating any of the authors I already have. Ergo, no Discorsi, no other plays of Marlowe's, no Shepherdes Calendar or whatnot.
I know some of you are thorough-going Elizabethan geeks; any suggestions as to sources I could mine for that last epigraph?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 04:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 05:36 am (UTC)Sir Philip Sidney
Thomas Nashe
George Chapman
Thomas Kyd
Any love there?
Actually, The Spanish Tragedy would be a great choice.
Hey, do I get to read this?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 05:44 am (UTC)Hey, do I get to read this?
If you mean my book, yes, when it hits print around June of next year. If you mean The Spanish Tragedy, nobody's stopping you that I know of. <g>
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 05:46 am (UTC)*g*
We'll be hitting print around the same time. We can do the volcano movie thing!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 05:50 am (UTC)I'd been wondering if our release dates were as close together as I thought. I had offered to review Ink & Steel for Strange Horizons; I may have to think about recusing myself, on the grounds that I'm too close to the subject matter for anything resembling objectivity. (I don't think they'll want a review full of "hey, she found the same obscure bit of folklore I did!" or "dammit, I wish I had known about that historical incident.")
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 06:01 am (UTC)Also, 100% Tiresias-free. ;-)
By the way, I think I forgot to mention that I happen to think the Riggs biographies are kind of ass. (His Ben Jonson one inspired much scribbling in the margins, though his Marlowe is better.) The Park Honan ones filled me with glee, though....
Who is your publisher for this?
(Hey, I have been pleased to see you doing some in-depth research. *g* Just tell me you didn't use Dead Spaniard. Because if I read one more fucking Elizabethan fantasy with a Dead Spaniard reference...)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 03:00 pm (UTC)As am I, though originally I thought it would be otherwise. But my set consists of Walsingham, Beale, Hunsdon, the Countess of Warwick, Dee, and of course Elizabeth. (Plus assorted minorlings.)
Our two books may be crossover fic waiting to happen. <lol>
Riggs: I found his book pleasantly readable, but ultimately, the only thing I used it for was to decide that Kit wouldn't be in my book after all, except in a passing mention. So any errors he might have made won't screw me up, fortunately.
Orbit (formerly Warner), I'm the stereotype of the perfectionist Virgo, and I promise, no Dead Spaniard. :-)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 10:43 pm (UTC)Anyway, I can't wait to read what you've done with the old place. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:41 am (UTC)(Any other horrible Elizabethan-fiction cliches I should know about and avoid? I appear not to have read enough of the subgenre to be aware of things like an overuse of Dead Spaniard and the heresy of turning John Dee into some neo-pagan earth-mother-worshipping hippie.)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:55 am (UTC)It's, er.
A long story.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:58 am (UTC)I've been very thorough about ignoring/forgetting stuff that comes post-1590, so as to minimize the risk of confusing myself.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 04:19 pm (UTC)Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:23 am (UTC)John Dee perhaps....
Date: 2007-08-05 04:26 pm (UTC)Another place to look for various Elizabethans:
http://www.elizabethanauthors.com/
And for Ren. Literature in general:
http://www.luminarium.org/renlit/essays.htm
Re: John Dee perhaps....
Date: 2007-08-06 03:24 am (UTC)Re: John Dee perhaps....
Date: 2007-08-06 12:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-05 09:52 pm (UTC)In the spirit of the Shakespearean period, though, would you consider a translation of a classical work? English versions of Greek and Roman stories / pieces were fairly popular then.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 04:21 am (UTC)Great choice of icon, though. <g>
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 07:48 pm (UTC)If you have the time, I'd love to talk to you about writing faerie novels. I saw in the cliché thread that you used English folklore rather than the "traditional" Irish/Scottish take. This intrigues me, as I plan to go one step further into Asia for my faerie story.
Anyway, I look forward to hearing more!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 04:01 am (UTC)