Date: 2009-02-06 05:52 pm (UTC)
My problem with this is that "literature" and "literary writing" has been put on a pedestal by a particular group of self-perpetuating authorities. Certain aspects of writing are considered better and more important than others, not for any good reason I can see other than "that's the sort of thing I like, and I've got these other English professors to back me up".

This is a thorny question, I think, getting into issues of what constitutes "quality" in a general sense, etc. But I do think there's some real validity to what you're saying: for example, the English lit canon being mostly formed by upper-class white Protestant males, they were culturally inclined to value manly stories of war as being more "important" than squishy female stories of marriage. Exceptions exist -- they always do; there were influential UPWPMs who praised Jane Austen to the skies. But those tend to be exceptions.

And I think it feeds in on itself, too, in an analogue of what's happened in some SF. Just as certain branches of science fiction tend to be appealing (or even comprehensible) only to people already versed in the genre, high-end literature has turned inward in search of qualities opaque to the general reader. And it's hard not to read a quasi-class aspect into the trend of valuing the arcane and devaluing that which is accessible to a broad audience.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

swan_tower: (Default)
swan_tower

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45 678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 07:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios