a possible explanation of the Amazon thing

I don't know if this theory is correct, but I frankly consider it a more likely explanation than "Amazon's executives got lobotomized and decided to institute a PR disaster over Easter weekend" --

http://tehdely.livejournal.com/88823.html

Short form is, some organization (no idea who) may have mobilized to flag certain content on Amazon until an automated feature kicks in to remove it from the rankings. It would explain the bizarre selection of items hit, and also why the initial response of Amazon flacks was to say they're de-ranking "adult" content -- if this theory's right, that's exactly what they're doing, but they hadn't yet realized somebody was gaming the system.

And Easter weekend is a sadly unsurprising time to see positive LGBT* content hit in such fashion.

So. We'll see what develops. But this makes a lot more sense to me than this being some kind of actual corporate decision on Amazon's part.


*Or whatever form of abbrevation you prefer. Man, I hadn't realized just how many permutations of initials that cluster of ideas had until I started seeing posts about this incident all over my flist. What the heck is the (QQI) add-on?

two things that make me angry

I'll put the important one first: a lengthy article on Dubai that frankly just turns my stomach, presenting both the dark underside and the artificially bright topside of that city. I presume not everybody in Dubai is like the Emiratis and expats quoted there, but that's the image of Dubai I've seen marketed: a sunny playground for shopping and leisure, to be enjoyed by the wealthy -- just don't ask what's propping it up.

The second one's smaller, but closer to home: apprehension about Pixar's latest, Up. Why the apprehension? Are they worried it will be a flop? No; in fact, everybody's pretty much assuming it will be a critical and commercial success. But probably it won't be as big of a hit as (say) Toy Story, and (perhaps more to the point) it doesn't have all the merchandising opportunities of that film, and so nevermind that Pixar has yet to release a single film that could be termed a critical or commercial flop; some corners of the industry are worried that Pixar's films aren't as lucrative as they used to be, and this is a problem. Not that they aren't profitable; they are. But that they aren't always increasing in profits.

I find that outlook diseased. Here we have a rock-solid company that has, since its inception, turned out quality entertainment that also brings in a nice, healthy return on the investment of making it. But hits, it seems, aren't enough; they must be mega-hits, and ever-growing in size, or Wall Street will flip out.

Can you say "unsustainable model"? I can.

Anyway. I've had those tabs open in my browser for a couple of days, but I decided not to rain on Easter Sunday with them, so you get them today. Enjoy. So to speak.

a (purposely) slightly-delayed goodie

Since I posted the excerpt late, and since the schedule would have had me posting this one on a weekend, I decided to wait until today. But now you can head on over to Flickr and see my photos from my research trip last year.

The Ashes pics are fewer in number than the Midnight ones because I inadvertently left my camera cable at home when I went to London; this mean I couldn't download my photos to my laptop, which meant I was limited to the capacity of my (rather small) SD card. I kept having to delete my poorer or less important shots to make room for new ones. But you can see several of the locations that will be appearing in the novel, or at least whatever's currently standing on their sites now, plus other things representative of the period.

They are also pegged onto a map, if you want to know where those things are.