(no subject)
Mar. 26th, 2008 10:25 amThis won't be as argumentative as the last time I linked to a Mind Meld, but there's some argumentation here.
The question posed in the Mind Meld is this: "Is science fiction antithetical to religion?"
There are some good answers behind that link. (Also some long answers.) They expose, among other things, the vagueness of that question. You can take it in the sense implied by the lines that precede it: "Two of the most highly regarded fantasy authors - Tolkien and Lewis - were also Christians, whereas the fathers of science fiction were atheists, and SF itself, it could be argued, grew out of Darwinism and other notions of deep time." In that sense, it seems to be asking whether you can write science fiction while also being religious, and the subsequent answers have comprehensively blown the "SF was founded by atheists" premise out of the water.
But there are other aspects to the question. Are the aims of science fiction incompatible with those of religion? That depends on how one views the aims of both; there are both "yes" and "no" answers at various points in the discussion. Adam Roberts almost seems to equate SF with Protestantism and fantasy with Catholicism. ??? James Wallace Harris's answer reminds me uncomfortably of the things I was ranting about in "Frazer's Goddamned Golden Bough" -- that you can create that kind of pseudo-evolutionary path for human thought. (At least he allows for the transgression of his categories, instead of assuming we outgrow the older ones.) Several people touch on fundamentalism versus other approaches to religion, and how that relates to religious thought.
Almost all of them, though, assume "religion" = "Christianity" -- or, at most, the Religions of the Book. On the one hand, this is fair; most of our genre tradition has been written by Westerners. On the other hand, if we want to talk about the compatibility or lack thereof between SF and religion, we should address the existence of other faiths. John C. Wright's the only one who really does so (in an answer that is also the longest there, since he discusses three or four novels along the way). He talks about Ursula LeGuin's Taoist influences and the Zen Buddhism in Spider Robinson's Variable Star, and speculates interestingly on our different attitudes toward Eastern and Western religion. I'd love to see more discussion of that, especially since I disagree with Wright that swapping out a Buddhist for a Catholic priest is a change of "one detail." But that kind of discussion requires a good working knowledge of Buddhist theology (or Hindu, or any other non-Book religion) that I don't pretend to have. (Heck, I wouldn't even claim my Catholic theology is up to snuff.)
Interesting stuff any way you slice it. And it successfully got my brain to work shortly after waking up, which is in its own right nearly a miracle sufficient to prove the existence of God.
The question posed in the Mind Meld is this: "Is science fiction antithetical to religion?"
There are some good answers behind that link. (Also some long answers.) They expose, among other things, the vagueness of that question. You can take it in the sense implied by the lines that precede it: "Two of the most highly regarded fantasy authors - Tolkien and Lewis - were also Christians, whereas the fathers of science fiction were atheists, and SF itself, it could be argued, grew out of Darwinism and other notions of deep time." In that sense, it seems to be asking whether you can write science fiction while also being religious, and the subsequent answers have comprehensively blown the "SF was founded by atheists" premise out of the water.
But there are other aspects to the question. Are the aims of science fiction incompatible with those of religion? That depends on how one views the aims of both; there are both "yes" and "no" answers at various points in the discussion. Adam Roberts almost seems to equate SF with Protestantism and fantasy with Catholicism. ??? James Wallace Harris's answer reminds me uncomfortably of the things I was ranting about in "Frazer's Goddamned Golden Bough" -- that you can create that kind of pseudo-evolutionary path for human thought. (At least he allows for the transgression of his categories, instead of assuming we outgrow the older ones.) Several people touch on fundamentalism versus other approaches to religion, and how that relates to religious thought.
Almost all of them, though, assume "religion" = "Christianity" -- or, at most, the Religions of the Book. On the one hand, this is fair; most of our genre tradition has been written by Westerners. On the other hand, if we want to talk about the compatibility or lack thereof between SF and religion, we should address the existence of other faiths. John C. Wright's the only one who really does so (in an answer that is also the longest there, since he discusses three or four novels along the way). He talks about Ursula LeGuin's Taoist influences and the Zen Buddhism in Spider Robinson's Variable Star, and speculates interestingly on our different attitudes toward Eastern and Western religion. I'd love to see more discussion of that, especially since I disagree with Wright that swapping out a Buddhist for a Catholic priest is a change of "one detail." But that kind of discussion requires a good working knowledge of Buddhist theology (or Hindu, or any other non-Book religion) that I don't pretend to have. (Heck, I wouldn't even claim my Catholic theology is up to snuff.)
Interesting stuff any way you slice it. And it successfully got my brain to work shortly after waking up, which is in its own right nearly a miracle sufficient to prove the existence of God.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 03:59 pm (UTC)"Does Islam have any prohibitions that would prevent cyberware?"
So far I can't find any, but I'm not the Islam specialist. And there's a reason for the question. It involves Transsexuals and Dubai.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 04:23 pm (UTC)the subsequent answers have comprehensively blown the "SF was founded by atheists" premise out of the water
Did they? Asimov and Heinlein were atheists, Clarke wandered between atheist and Deist, Wells was atheist, Verne allegedly wasn't. Don't know about Doc Smith. That's certainly a set far more atheist than the general population. Then there's atheist Lovecraft, straddling three genres.
But yeah, vague question.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 04:26 pm (UTC)GURPS Transhuman Space had an amusing spin, though; the Islamic Caliphate treats AIs as citizens, extrapolating from djinn, but treated ghosts (uploads) as abominations.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 04:31 pm (UTC)As for the atheists . . . well, it depends on who you're claiming as the founding fathers, doesn't it? But my phrasing is sloppy anyway, since what I really mean is that the answers comprehensively show that there are plenty of non-atheist SF writers, throughout the history of the genre, including many who might be called founding fathers. So certainly one can be religious and still write SF.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 04:39 pm (UTC)And there's "okay, the author is religious, but does their religion inform their fiction -- and if so, how? -- or are they compartmentalized, with even religious authors writing in a de facto materialist universe?"
That's one big difference between fantasy and most SF, I think: the fantasy can easily have gods, ghosts, or souls on-stage, and religious truths undeniable. SF slides toward psionics (with some after-death survivals) and weakly godlike "energy beings", and I think has been sliding away from both more recently. Having a naked god, let alone God, in an SF novel would automatically mark it as highly unusual.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 04:48 pm (UTC)For this reason especially, I am anxious to see the last season of the new Battlestar Galactica. How the Cylon God is/isn't depicted/explained will be a telling point in determining how BSG acquits itself in this discussion.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 11:21 pm (UTC)...though the interesting thing is that a lot of these feminist-spirituality-influenced stories also rely upon something based on Christianity to provide antagonists for their goddess-worshipers, so is that really escaping/subverting the presence of religions of the Book?
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 12:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 02:26 am (UTC)Speaking of other media, though, I think it's interesting that I can think of lots of Sci-Fi films that invoke religion and the naked God right off the top of my head.
Hell, I've got Southland Tales playing as we speak.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 03:09 am (UTC)Erm, that totally didn't answer your question.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 05:23 am (UTC)But that was an interesting answer!