swan_tower (
swan_tower) wrote2007-06-02 01:32 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
clearing some tabs
Apropos of nothing: these earrings amuse me.
Apropos of fanfic: since I managed to attract much more discussion than usual the last time I talked about fanfic, I know there are more than a few of you who would find these two interesting. First, something about the whole FanLib wankery (which I presume you're aware of), discussing fanfiction as a mode of cultural production. And second, a lengthy post from Making Light (home of the Nielsen Haydens and others), on the sucking pit of quicksand that is the question of legality and fanfiction, with a very useful section toward the end about the disclaimers people slap on their stories.
I don't know if I'm as optimistic as part of that post is, about the likelihood of a given piece of fanfic being declared "transformative" if challenged in court, but it's true -- as far as I'm aware -- about that being the real sticking-point. And when you look at it in that light, you could probably have an interesting argument about which is the more transformative work: Terry Brooks' The Sword of Shannara or HobbitChick4Evar's latest installment of her epic Frodo/Sam slashfest. One copies the plot of The Lord of the Rings point for point; the other does not. I don't know which side of that argument I'd be on, honestly, or whether I'd declare either (or both) transformative -- but the point is, I think the argument could happen, with good points on both sides.
(Having said that, hells yeah is "The Game of the Gods" transformative. That thing's freaking brilliant. Middle-Earth fanfic and parody/critical typology of Mary Sues, all rolled up in one entertaining package.)
Anyway, I figured I'd toss those out there so I could close those tabs and stop having them clutter up my browser.
Apropos of fanfic: since I managed to attract much more discussion than usual the last time I talked about fanfic, I know there are more than a few of you who would find these two interesting. First, something about the whole FanLib wankery (which I presume you're aware of), discussing fanfiction as a mode of cultural production. And second, a lengthy post from Making Light (home of the Nielsen Haydens and others), on the sucking pit of quicksand that is the question of legality and fanfiction, with a very useful section toward the end about the disclaimers people slap on their stories.
I don't know if I'm as optimistic as part of that post is, about the likelihood of a given piece of fanfic being declared "transformative" if challenged in court, but it's true -- as far as I'm aware -- about that being the real sticking-point. And when you look at it in that light, you could probably have an interesting argument about which is the more transformative work: Terry Brooks' The Sword of Shannara or HobbitChick4Evar's latest installment of her epic Frodo/Sam slashfest. One copies the plot of The Lord of the Rings point for point; the other does not. I don't know which side of that argument I'd be on, honestly, or whether I'd declare either (or both) transformative -- but the point is, I think the argument could happen, with good points on both sides.
(Having said that, hells yeah is "The Game of the Gods" transformative. That thing's freaking brilliant. Middle-Earth fanfic and parody/critical typology of Mary Sues, all rolled up in one entertaining package.)
Anyway, I figured I'd toss those out there so I could close those tabs and stop having them clutter up my browser.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Many friends have said similar things. To which I have to confess that my total lack of sophistication or taste makes me impatient even with great heroic sagas if they have no humor. (Or none that I can perceive.) I'm just not very into heroic gods and monsters and men all smiting one another without wise-cracking sidekicks or hapless dweebs commenting from the sidelines.
no subject
no subject
no subject